Meze Audio VS TRN

Alba —vs— Conch

Meze Audio

Alba

Dynamic
Driver architecture 10.8mm Dynamic
Impedance 32Ω
Sensitivity 109dB SPL/mW @1kHz
Tuning reference
TRN

Conch

Dynamic
Driver architecture 10mm DLC Dynamic
Impedance 30Ω
Sensitivity 114dB
Tuning reference

Comparison Notes

Meze Audio Alba and TRN Conch solve the same IEM buying question from different hardware starting points. Alba uses 10.8mm Dynamic, while Conch uses 10mm DLC Dynamic, so the comparison should start with architecture before moving to price or brand preference.

At least one sensitivity value lacks a voltage/power reference or is unconfirmed. These numbers cannot rank loudness, amplifier needs or sound quality.

Side-by-Side Specifications

Pair Alba Conch
Config 10.8mm Dynamic 10mm DLC Dynamic
Driver architecture Dynamic Dynamic
Impedance 32Ω 30Ω
Sensitivity 109dB SPL/mW @1kHz 114dB
Tuning reference
Price range $100-$200 $0-$50

Sources and specification limits

GK AudioLab publishes GK product information. Comparisons involving GK models are brand-authored; source specifications are not independent listening tests.

Meze Audio Alba

Manufacturer: Meze Audio · Source checked:

Sensitivity is stated per milliwatt. Preserve any stated test frequency and tolerance; it is not directly comparable with a per-volt figure.

TRN Conch

Manufacturer: TRN · Source checked:

Conch includes three tuning nozzles. Compare the same nozzle configuration. The listed 114dB sensitivity has no electrical reference in the inspected source.

— means the inspected source does not establish a reliable value.

Price bands are historical directory categories, not current offers. Confirm the exact model, nozzle, cable, local price and return terms with the seller.